Thursday, January 7, 2010

Review: GRACELING by Kristin Cashore

There were so many parts of this book that I absolutely loved only to be negated by some serious issues for me. I LOVED the romantic tension between Po and Katsa. Before reading the book I disbelieved one of the blurbs that said it had the tension of Twilight, but for a while in this book I actually quite agree. But then they ruined the tension—had premarital sex—about halfway through the book and I no longer worried about them getting together. Edward and Bella worked better in Twilight because Edward was always tempted by Bella’s blood (at least in the first one).

I LOVED Cashore's world building. The Graceling phenomenon was really too fun and I loved learning about the different Graces people could have. The two different color eyes was a great detail, too. But I wasn’t fond of the author’s narrative voice. That may be my own silly opinion since I always like the intimacy of first person and kept wishing for Katsa to say “I.”


I also had a huge problem with her name. She was the strong warrior type and what other book has that type of character with a protagonist of a similar name? That’s right—Hunger Games. Katniss, Katsa. I kept saying the wrong name in my head.


My last big issue was the not so subtle anti-marriage messages. I’m a huge fan of marriage, and not one but both main characters thought it would shackle them—and this was treated as normal. I know this is getting to be a common belief now, but it just didn’t fit with what I believe in.


This is a book that is close in genre to the one I have coming out this Fall so I am so glad to have read it. It took me less than 48 hours and I really, really enjoyed it. But there were times I skimmed (especially during the mountain pass) but I did truly love Cashore’s characters.


I loved the packaging for this book and the title. And wow, what an accomplishment for a debut.

8 comments:

  1. That's weird that there's an anti-marriage message. I don't know what to think of that!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I had Kristin Cashore's books on my to read list, and then couldn't find them at the library. After reading your review I have changed my mind. There's too much that would bother me. Thanks, Mary, you saved me some time that I can use in reading all the other great books on my list.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So am I supposed to believe that in a mediaeval fantasy world (as the cover suggests)that the societal norm is about the same as todays?
    I don't buy that as a person who understands ancient society. You couldn't even get away with that in ancient Rome.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So did you not like the author's voice, or the POV?

    Yeah,I think I'll skip this one. Not a fan of the anti-marriage theme, and like Karen said, there's tons of other books out there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good review Mary. You summed up everything I would be concerned about in a book. I don't think I would read it. Anti marriage stuff gets on my nerves. If the idea of marrying someone makes you feel shackled maybe you shouldn't be dating them.

    Like Karen, you saved me time. I would have picked it up because I like the cover.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Looks like the anti-marriage stuff really raised some eyebrows. I'm glad I mentioned it then.

    Tamara, I know I was mixing voice with POV. I guess I would have to admit that nearly all of my favorite books are told in first person. I feel that a voice can truly shine in that POV. You'll have to point out some books written in 3rd person POV with narrative voices that you truly love. And of course I'll be reading yours when it comes out. :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I hadn't heard of this book before. Thank you for your honest review.

    ReplyDelete